Thursday, November 14, 2024

Just the way we are

 

As I was reading this morning, this observation caught my attention. Part of my journey has gotten me to the place of accepting that God created me and He didn't make a mistake. I have taken comfort in that thought over the years when I was tempted (or accused) of being too weird, too shy, too contemplative, too... whatever. All those things that made me feel like something was wrong with me. Those things that left me feeling like I needed to apologize for the way I thought, or the feelings I had.

Once I accepted that it was God who made me, and I could trust that He knew what He was doing, it eased much of the angst that I had over performance to meet the expectations of others.

But the commentary today - even though I have heard it and have known it - somehow spoke to me and helped me realize that, Yes... God made me and He doesn't make mistakes... but, as someone witty has said, "God cleans the fish He catches."

It never hurts to be contemplative or introspective when it comes to examining truth and what that should look like in our own lives. Are there thought patterns or habits that need to come into alignment with the goal of looking more like Jesus? It's not a matter of if God loves us or not. That is a given if you believe that His Word is true. And I do. Rather, it is a matter of taking every thought captive, seeing ourselves and our behavior from a different perspective. How do our actions, words and thoughts line up with the plumbline of God's Word?

He has taught us from the very Beginning what it looks like to follow Him, how to be a set-apart people who will faithfully reflect His light in a dark world. Am I taking the time and effort each day to spend time learning and understanding how to walk that out? Our journey to anywhere does not begin and end as soon as we have our ticket in hand. We take the steps to move forward toward our destination, and sometimes (often) that involves changing our mindset and perspective. Whether it be a journey to a new country or culture, or our journey of life and walking out our calling to be people after God's own heart.

Accepting God's design in my life does not mean I should remain static in my spiritual development. Or, as Paul in his letter to the assembly of believers in Philippi says: "Work hard to show the results of your salvation, obeying God with deep reverence and awe." (And lest we have been duped into thinking that WORKS = LEGALISM, we should also heed the words of James, the brother of Jesus when he says, "faith apart from works is worthless."

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Pitiful Parenting

They say we are our own worst critic, and I am sure in many instances that is a valid observation. 

Take parenting, for example. As I look back on my childhood, I have only a few memories of feeling I was being treated unfairly, or misunderstood by one or both of my parents. As I have become more familiar with just how dysfunctional some families can be, I marvel that mine was (and still is) so functional and loving. Yes, I was spanked a few times for bad behavior, but never beaten. Yes, I was grounded on occasion for stepping out of bounds with rules or curfews. Yes, I got mad at one or another parent from time to time when I did not get my way. But honestly, that was so long ago it is barely a blip on my memory screen. Obviously it did not traumatize me.

However, when I came to be a parent myself (45+ years ago now,) those memories were a bit fresher, and I was determined to "do a better job" at parenting than my own parents had done. Sadly, no one gave me an instruction manual, and when I lamented my feelings of inadequacy and unpreparedness, my doctor told me, "Just love them." OK, I could do that.

I am here today to say, that is easy enough... but it is not enough. I love my daughters with all my heart. I have tried the "best I could with what I knew" to love them, teach them, and guide them. But, I have learned that these things do not happen by osmosis. In retrospect, it probably would have worked out better if I had been a little more intentional, a little less bound by my own insecurities and failures, and a lot less dependent on the concept that they would learn what they needed to know from church. Don't get me wrong, I am not blaming any of their excellent teachers for failing to accomplish the task set before them, but I am accepting that I fell short in fulfilling my own responsibility to fulfill the Deuteronomy 6:7 mandate: And you shall teach them diligently to your children and speak of them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.

I don't really have many memories of either parents or grandparents sitting down with me and sharing their faith journey, or even really praying with me beyond teaching me "Now I lay me down to sleep..." I basically mirrored their model of relying on Sunday school teachers to accomplish what is essentially our own responsibility to our children.

One doesn't need a theological degree to share the basic, foundational truths of what Scripture teaches in how we should live. Heaven sakes, to make matters easier, Jesus boiled it down to just two simple tests: Love God and Love Others. Everything taught in the first covenant falls into one of those categories.

Could I have done a better job? Absolutely! Would everything have turned out perfect? There are never any guarantees. (And don't bother throwing Proverbs 22:6 back at me: Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it. That is a premise, not a promise.)

But here is the thing: I AM STILL A PARENT, so instead of beating myself up about shoulda-woulda-coulda, the point is to start every interaction with the right mindset. How can I speak TRUTH by my everyday words and deeds? Yes, loving them is a great place to start, but speaking the Truth in Love has to fit in there somewhere, and that is the part I am working at now. Respecting that they have their own free will and their own "testimony" to work out is also part of it, and that is something that is the biggest challenge for me. Because, in the end, I still love them, no matter what.

Thursday, December 29, 2022

Hype, Hypocrisy, and Hysteria Hot Topics

I don't generally make a habit of listening to the news, unless something historically monumental is happening. Even with that, I can only stand so many hours of saturation. Sometimes events catch me by surprise, but usually I am better off for not being "in the know" about everything that MSM wants to throw at me.

One of the reasons I got off of Facebook this year also has to do with the negativity that seems to be rampant with everyone voicing their opinion about the economy, politics, racism, religion, gun control, abortion... ad nauseum. 

Not so long ago, yet another mass shooting hit the headlines. Don't get me wrong, I am 100% opposed to murder in any form, and mass shootings are particularly heinous in that usually innocents are the targeted victims, as compared to a premeditated, targeted murder victim. A common response when any kind of mass tragedy occurs is to see social media flooded with postings of prayers for the victims and their loved ones. Following that is the typical knee-jerk rant response, something along the lines of "F* your prayers! Stop Gun violence... Ban guns..." etc.

This post is not about gun control or gun violence per se, but more an effort to bring some perspective when it comes to the hype, hypocrisy, and hysteria that is promulgated by politicians and media regarding those hot topics. California's governor Gruesome Newsom has lately jumped on that hysteria bandwagon with his recently signed AB 1594, which allows the state, local governments and Californians to sue "irresponsible gunmakers" for the harm caused by their products. 

My question is this: Where do we draw the line? Take a look at these statistics on cause of deaths in the U.S. for the year 2020. (Most of this information was gathered from the CDC and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety websites.) 

Of the estimated 3,383,729 U.S. deaths in 2020...


Compare those numbers with Gun Related Death statistics:


(I have highlighted Homicides and Accidental as those seem to the ones that get most people up in arms.)

Here is the point I wish to make: The misuse of cars and the misuse of drugs kill around as many people as the misuse of guns. When are the politicians going to stop their hypocrisy? Why are they not signing bills allowing people to sue car manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, doctors, and liquor companies for all of the deaths that are caused by the products they manufacture or prescribe?

Wake up folks. Guns, drugs, and cars do not kill. Angry, sad, frustrated, vengeful people kill. If they don't have a gun, they will use whatever tool they can put their hands on: knives, baseball bats, machetes, battery acid... and yes, cars. 

What are we doing to fix the real problem?

Monday, November 21, 2022

Dear Pastor

Over 15 years ago I left church one Sunday morning, frustrated that another Scriptural teaching had been misrepresented from the pulpit. I will say right up front that I don't believe for a minute that a "deliberate lie" was being taught as "truth." I am sure that the speaker (not you, in that instance) was presenting the truth as they understood it. Nevertheless, I am going to use a broader brush as I paint the objection I want to raise today, and that is the Church has been distorting the teaching about the "Old Testament" and the "New Testament" for centuries which has led - not just in my opinion but the opinion of thousands of others - to a distorted view within the 21st century Christian Church in general about what God says in His word and how it applies to all of us as followers of Christ.


I walked out of church that morning, and I walked away from corporate fellowship for several years because I was frustrated and confused - I needed to do more reading and thinking for myself instead of accepting without question what was being taught each week from a pulpit. Eventually, I became involved in a home Bible fellowship with other believers who had come to the same theological fork in the road. Unfortunately, several years into that fellowship, I realized that there would always be a vocal few who had become so disenchanted with established religion that it seemed they mainly wanted to spend our time pointing out the errors in teaching and criticizing those believers who continued to remain in the traditional church, discounting the faith of many who were genuinely following Christ as best as they knew how.


That left me with a dilemma: 

  • Hebrews 10 clearly admonishes let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.
    I want and need to be in fellowship. But, does it really matter that, occasionally, teachings from the pulpit misrepresent Scripture? Does it matter that those misrepresentations perpetuate minor errors in doctrine that have snowballed down through the centuries? 

  • Matthew writes: in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?
    If I’m saying that some teaching misrepresents scripture, am I judging without examining the plank in my own eye? 

  • On the other hand, Peter wrote in his second letter: there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies. And Paul writes in Romans 13 to be subject to powers ordained by God.
    But who am I to say that what is being taught is false and destructive? Am I in doing so speaking against those in leadership (or authority?)

  • And Titus 10 warns against those who stir up division.
    Should I just shut up and live with what I see as errors, in order not to spread division?

It’s hard to discern the answer. To my way of thinking, if we are not faithful with the "small things" in doctrine and theology, where does that lead us as people who want to be, and claim to be, followers of Christ? That same Christ who claimed I am in the Father, and the Father (is) in Me. The words that I speak to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me... That same Christ who also said not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. And finally, the same Christ who said I am not come to abolish the Law and the Prophets... [and] not one dot of the Law would be done away with until Heaven and Earth are destroyed.


So what, you may ask, does that have to do with walking away from the church or disagreeing with what has been taught? What are my options when it comes to rightly dividing the Word of Truth? Not that I am overly concerned with what others think about me (because I hardly think "others" even give much thought to me in the first place,) but I don't want to be one who is constantly clanging a cymbal or sowing discord among the believers. Is it better that I just shut up and sit down, shut up and walk out, or take my questions to someone who will listen?


By now, I am sure you are scratching your head and ready to put down this letter, but I will try to get to the point of my frustration.


In the November 20, 2022 sermon about Church History, when explaining the difference between the "Old Covenant" and the "New Covenant", I had to question the validity of several points made. Was it simply a case of over-simplification in order to come up with concise bullet points for a visual? But these are the points that were represented:



Some of these are mostly true: 

  • Yes, the Old Testament was a foreshadowing of Messiah. But Christ himself said that he came to fulfill but not abolish God's commandments. Perhaps a better contrast would be "Foreshadowing > Made Flesh"

  • Yes, the tablets given to Moses were written on stone, but "external behavior" should be the outcome of a changed heart. Abraham's faith and obedience were counted to him as righteousness; are those not external behaviors? 

  • The “Law” is our Instruction on how to live our lives in accordance with God’s perfect wisdom, as evidence of our being a chosen and set-apart people. Many of His instructions are basic principles that can be applied even when the historical or cultural context no longer applies. Other instructions (like bacon and shrimp) we may not understand the why, but I think it's safe to say the we can (and should) trust God to know what we don't know. (Then you have the rabbis who added "guards" to God's Instructions down through the centuries which then ended up being given more importance than God's original instructions. This was actually a violation of the command to neither add to nor take away from the Instructions God gave. Nowhere does God tell us we can't eat a cheeseburger or have to use two sets of dishes for meat and dairy.) 

  • When Christ came, he lived a life demonstrating how those Instructions or principles were to apply in real life. He called out the rabbis for making their rules more important than God's instructions. When he ascended to heaven after his crucifixion, he gave the Holy Spirit to come alongside and guide us in being his “set-apart” people.

Confusing the issue, it was stated outright in the November 20 presentation that the Old Testament was for the nation of Israel, and that gentiles being included in the faith started in the book of Acts of the Apostles.

I don't believe I am veering too far off track when I question this. (I think what I actually said at the time was, "That's not true!")


Walter Kaiser Jr., President Emeritus of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, wrote Mission in the Old Testament to challenge the idea that mission [to gentiles] is a New Testament development... God promised to bless Abraham and bless all peoples through him. God’s promise of blessing, which also appears in the creation accounts of Genesis, is one of the key themes that make up His promise.

Kaiser's contention is that God didn't forget the rest of the world when He chose Abraham. Instead, God was choosing Israel to be His light and emissary to the rest of the world. 


Israel was set apart by God as a nation to emulate. Isaiah 42 says: I, the Lord, have called you in righteousness; I will take hold of your hand. I will keep you and will make you to be a covenant for the people and a light for the [nations.]  In Exodus, God says that He delivered Israel not only for their own benefit, but so that "the Egyptians will know that I am the LORD."


The Old Testament is full of examples of gentiles who were followers of the God of Israel: Melchizedek, Job, Jethro, Balaam, Rahab, and Ruth, and we are told in Exodus 12 that a mixed multitude left Egypt with the sons of Jacob. Further, in Exodus 12, Numbers 15, Leviticus 24 and elsewhere God states: "One law shall be for the native-born and for the stranger who dwells among you.”


Under the Old Covenant, circumcision was the sign of that allowed a stranger dwelling among them to become as a native of the land. It was the physical symbol of God's covenant with Abraham which demonstrated that person had become set apart. Anyone who did not have the sign of the covenant became cut off and could not share in the land inheritance. It has been argued by many that circumcision is a covenant tied to the land of Israel. It is true that by the time of Christ and 1st century Judaism, the Messianic kingdom and land inheritance were tied together. 


It is also true that in the 1st century church, the apostles agreed that the minimum standard for gentile converts who were turning to YHVH was to abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from things strangled, and from blood. (Acts 15:19-20) They were not expected to have all their religious training at the time of baptism. In other words, they were to turn from elements of pagan worship, then be baptized, and then spend time in the word to become familiar with how to live their lives set apart for God as a witness (or light) to others For Peter and James concluded at the Jerusalem Council in verse 21 that "Moses has had throughout many generations those who preach him in every city, being read in the synagogues every Sabbath”, which implied that further instruction to the new converts was to be received in weekly teaching from Scriptures (which at that time was only the "Old" Testament!) 


This is just one small point of doctrine that I want to address. My point being, these differences in how we understand or apply Scripture have led over the years to a theology that teaches "The Church" has replaced Israel, which is anti-Semitic in nature and ignores the fact that God repeatedly says throughout Scripture that He is not finished with Israel, that Christ came to call the Lost Sheep of Israel, and we are grafted in to Israel!


This is my concern: that by saying - or even implying - that the Old Testament was ‘for the Jews’ (which is exactly what many people in Christian churches today say and believe), we are saying that the God who is the same yesterday, today, and forever, the God who gave us the instructions for how we are to live our lives set apart for Him as a witness to the nations, just one day between Malachi and Matthew suddenly decided, ‘Oops, I changed my mind.’ Yes, that sounds like a ludicrous over-simplification, but isn't that the logical conclusion of that teaching?


I think we need to be very careful to rightly divide the Word of Truth, and not simply keep repeating doctrines of men that have been handed down through the years by those in the second and third centuries who sought to distance themselves from "the Jews" when the going got rough after the Bar Kokhba revolt.


But, my bottom line is still this: I don't want to be "that Christian" who is so convinced of his/her own interpretation of Scripture and constantly arguing and finding fault with others. I have walked the tightrope of following the teaching of others even when it didn't seem to line up with what I was reading for myself, and it took decades before I arrived at the place that I was able to give myself permission to disagree. Disagreeing doesn't mean hating, and it does not give me permission to sow discord, but it does mean that I am still left with a dilemma - how do I properly respond and react when I believe that the intent of Scripture is being misrepresented from a position of authority (i.e., the pulpit)?


I know this was not short, but I hope you were able to discern my point, and I trust that you will have some good insight. I very much appreciate you and the heart you have for our assembly and for our region. (And I would not have bothered to bring my concern to you if I felt you do not care about me and what I think.)


Thursday, September 8, 2022

God Save the King

It’s a sad day for the Anglophiles of the world today as we bid farewell to Queen Elizabeth II and say “God Save the King” for King Charles III. Queen Elizabeth has been on the throne since I was 4 months of age, the longest lived and longest reigning monarch in British history. One statistic claims that 9/10 of the world’s population has never known any other British monarch but QEII. I think it's fitting that she died in Scotland, at her estate in Balmoral, her favorite place.


Interesting that the British rail union has called off its national strike out of respect for the Queen. Also interesting that the flags in the U.S. will fly at half-mast and the House of Representatives have adjourned for the day in her honor. I’ll bet George Washington and Thomas Jefferson did not see that coming.

Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Smoke Gets in Our Eyes

It is always the same, I wash my car and it rains.
I mention our cooler temps and clear skies and what do we have this week but triple digits and smoke.
Lucky for us, we are headed north for a few days, and hopefully that will translate to a brief respite from "Hot August Nights."

Thursday, August 11, 2022

44784 :: August Again

 It would be remiss of me not to take note of the fact that it is once again Summer in the NorthState - and we are blessedly in the midst of not just a "cooling trend", but enjoying smoke-free skies for the first summer in several years. 

Granted, not everyone located in the northstate shares that blessing with us as evidenced by the map on InciWeb:


...but I for one am not going to let the occasion of having a full week in the 90's pass by without giving thanks for the blessed reprieve of what I can only hope translates to a PG&E bill under $200. this month.